Coastal Carolina
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
413  Letitia Saayman SO 20:49
468  Kyla Van Graan FR 20:53
1,473  Emily Marchini SR 22:02
1,552  Shelby Nicosia SR 22:07
2,110  Emma Hulburd SR 22:43
2,210  Janel Reeves SR 22:49
3,197  Jackie Brengel SO 24:19
3,248  LaChelsie Thomas SO 24:27
3,312  Samantha Stady SO 24:36
3,610  Regina Peattie SO 25:57
National Rank #139 of 340
Southeast Region Rank #20 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 21.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Letitia Saayman Kyla Van Graan Emily Marchini Shelby Nicosia Emma Hulburd Janel Reeves Jackie Brengel LaChelsie Thomas Samantha Stady Regina Peattie
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/05 1171 20:37 21:32 22:01 22:13 23:01 22:41 25:20
Blue Ridge Open 10/18 1185 20:57 21:05 21:53 22:29 22:11 23:01 24:04 24:10 24:32 25:32
Big South Championships 11/02 1036 20:23 20:30 21:43 21:44 23:26 22:42 24:24 24:43 24:42 26:34
Southeast Region Championships 11/15 1164 21:28 20:32 22:50 21:59 22:29 24:04 24:33





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 22.3 665 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.5 3.6 6.3 9.5 13.0 18.8 18.3 13.1 6.6 4.7 2.2 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Letitia Saayman 52.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.6
Kyla Van Graan 58.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3
Emily Marchini 160.2
Shelby Nicosia 169.2
Emma Hulburd 226.9
Janel Reeves 234.9
Jackie Brengel 299.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.2% 0.2 15
16 0.3% 0.3 16
17 1.5% 1.5 17
18 3.6% 3.6 18
19 6.3% 6.3 19
20 9.5% 9.5 20
21 13.0% 13.0 21
22 18.8% 18.8 22
23 18.3% 18.3 23
24 13.1% 13.1 24
25 6.6% 6.6 25
26 4.7% 4.7 26
27 2.2% 2.2 27
28 0.9% 0.9 28
29 0.7% 0.7 29
30 0.1% 0.1 30
31 0.2% 0.2 31
32 0.0% 0.0 32
33 0.0% 0.0 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0